ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
In silico identification of archaeal DNA-binding proteins.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe rapid advancement of next-generation sequencing technologies has generated an immense volume of genetic data. However, these data are unevenly distributed, with well-studied organisms being disproportionately represented, while other organisms, such as from archaea, remain significantly underexplored. The study of archaea is particularly challenging due to the extreme environments they inhabit and the difficulties associated with culturing them in the laboratory. Despite these challenges, archaea likely represent a crucial evolutionary link between eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms, and their investigation could shed light on the early stages of life on Earth. Yet, a significant portion of archaeal proteins are annotated with limited or inaccurate information. Among the various classes of archaeal proteins, DNA-binding proteins are of particular importance. While they represent a large portion of every known proteome, their identification in archaea is complicated by the substantial evolutionary divergence between archaeal and the other better studied organisms.
resultsTo address the challenges of identifying DNA-binding proteins in archaea, we developed Xenusia, a neural network-based tool capable of screening entire archaeal proteomes to identify DNA-binding proteins. Xenusia has proven effective across diverse datasets, including metagenomics data, successfully identifying novel DNA-binding proteins, with experimental validation of its predictions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Xenusia is available as a PyPI package, with source code accessible at https://github.com/grogdrinker/xenusia, and as a Google Colab web server application at xenusia.ipynb.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.