ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Detecting known neoepitopes, gene fusions, transposable elements, and circular RNAs in cell-free RNA.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- neomerDB: a comprehensive database of neomer biomarkers in cancer.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationCancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide, and although there have been advances in treatments, including immunotherapies, these often require biopsies which can be costly and invasive to obtain. Due to lack of pre-emptive cancer detection methods, many cases of cancer are detected at a late stage when the definitive symptoms appear. Plasma samples are relatively easy to obtain, and they can be used to monitor the molecular signatures of ongoing processes in the body. Profiling cell-free DNA is a popular method for monitoring cancer, but only a few studies have explored the use of cell-free RNA (cfRNA), which shows the recent footprint of systemic transcription.
resultsHere, we developed FastNeo, a computational method for detecting known neoepitopes in human cfRNA. We show that neoepitopes and other biomarkers detected in cfRNA can discern Hepatocellular carcinoma patients from the healthy patients with a sensitivity of 0.84 and a specificity of 0.79. For colorectal cancer we achieve a sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.8. An important advantage of our cfRNA based approach is that it also reports putative neoepitopes which are important for therapeutic purposes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The FastNeo package is available at https://github.com/yashumayank/FastNeo and https://zenodo.org/records/11521368. The benchmark pipelines to detect Immune Epitope database and Tumor-Specific Neoantigen database neoepitopes using HaplotypeCaller, bcftools, and Lofreq, and to run FastNeo with STAR instead of Bowtie2 are also available in the above github repository.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.