Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40314987›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Thermodynamic consistency of autocatalytic cycles.

Thomas Kosc, Denis Kuperberg, Etienne Rajon, Sylvain Charlat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas Kosc *Laboratoire de Biométrie & Biologie Evolutive, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, Villeurbanne 69622, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9287-1588
Denis Kuperberg *Laboratoire de l'Informatique du Parallélisme, École Normale Supérieure Lyon, CNRS, Lyon 69007, France.
Etienne RajonLaboratoire de Biométrie & Biologie Evolutive, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, Villeurbanne 69622, France.
Sylvain CharlatLaboratoire de Biométrie & Biologie Evolutive, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, Villeurbanne 69622, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0760-0087

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) ANR-17-CE02-0021-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autocatalysis is seen as a potential key player in the origin of life, and perhaps more generally in the emergence of Darwinian dynamics. Building on recent formalizations of this phenomenon, we tackle the computational challenge of exhaustively detecting minimal autocatalytic cycles (autocatalytic cores) in reaction networks and further evaluate the impact of thermodynamic constraints on their realization under mass action kinetics. We first characterize the complexity of the detection problem by proving its NP-completeness. This justifies the use of constraint solvers to list all cores in a given reaction network, and also to group them into compatible sets, composed of cores whose stoichiometric requirements are not contradictory. Crucially, we show that the introduction of thermodynamic realism does constrain the composition of these sets. Compatibility relationships among autocatalytic cores can indeed be disrupted when the reaction kinetics obey thermodynamic consistency throughout the network. On the contrary, these constraints have no impact on the realizability of isolated cores, unless upper or lower bounds are imposed on the concentrations of the reactants. Overall, by better characterizing the conditions of autocatalysis in complex reaction systems, this work brings us a step closer to assessing the contribution of this collective chemical behavior to the emergence of natural selection in the primordial soup.

Indexed as

autocatalysisNP-completenessorigin of lifeSMT solverthermodynamics

Identifiers

PMID40314987
PMCPMC12067211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.