Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40314952›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Emergency Department Triage Accuracy and Delays in Care for High-Risk Conditions.

Dana R Sax, E Margaret Warton, Dustin G Mark, Mary E Reed

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dana R SaxThe Permanente Medical Group, Pleasanton, California.
E Margaret WartonThe Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Pleasanton, California.
Dustin G MarkThe Permanente Medical Group, Pleasanton, California.
Mary E ReedThe Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Pleasanton, California.

Funding

Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Emergency department (ED) triage may impact timeliness of care for high-risk conditions. Objective: To determine the association of ED undertriage with delays in care for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), aortic dissection (AD), and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included adult ED patients diagnosed with SAH, AD, or STEMI from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020, from a multicenter, community-based health care delivery system. Data analysis were completed in March 2023 to October 2024. Exposure: Undertriage vs correct triage, defined by operational measures of mistriage. Main Outcomes and Measures: Using a lognormal distribution, the outcomes of interest for patients with SAH and AD were adjusted median time to noncontrast computed tomography (CT) (head CT for patients with SAH, chest CT for patients with AD), antihypertensive medication orders (SAH), and β-blocker orders (AD), and ED length of stay (LOS). For patients with STEMI, outcomes of interest were adjusted median time to electrocardiogram (ECG) and troponin orders. Results: A total of 5929 patients (median [IQR] age, 63.0 [54.0 to 73.0] years; 3876 [65.4%] male) were identified, including 915 with SAH, 480 with AD, and 4534 with STEMI. There were 1129 Asian patients (19.0%), 553 Black patients (9.3%), 889 Hispanic patients (15.0%), and 2906 non-Hispanic White patients (49.0%). Overall, 2175 patients (36.7%) were undertriaged. For patients with SAH, the lognormal estimate for delay in time to head CT was 0.2 (95% CI, 0.0-0.3), or a delay of 2.4 minutes, and for antihypertensive orders, the lognormal estimate was 4.8 (95% CI, 3.6-5.9), or a delay of 33.3 minutes; the lognormal estimate for ED LOS was 0.1 (95% CI, 0.0-0.1), or 7.7 minutes longer. For patients with AD, the lognormal estimate for delays were 0.2 (95% CI, 0.0-0.4), or 8.9 minutes, for chest CT and 0.5 (95% CI, 0.2-0.7), or 17.6 minutes, for β-blocker orders, and ED LOS was 0.2 (95% CI, 0.1-0.3), or 64 minutes longer. For patients with STEMI, differences in time to ECG and troponin orders were not statistically significant, at less than 1 minute, comparing correctly and undertriaged patients. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients diagnosed with SAH, AD, or STEMI, ED undertriage was associated with small but significant delays in key diagnostic and therapeutic orders for patients with SAH and AD but not for patients with STEMI.

Indexed as

Aortic DissectionEmergency Service, HospitalST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionSubarachnoid HemorrhageTime-to-TreatmentTriageAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID40314952
PMCPMC12048854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.