ArticleJAMA network open2025
Emergency Department Triage Accuracy and Delays in Care for High-Risk Conditions.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of large language models for emergency department triage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Initial Ward Admission Followed by Early Respiratory Intermediate Care Transfer and In-Hospital Mortality.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Observational
- Virtual nursing implementation and 30-day patient readmissions: a multi-site study.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Understanding door-to-needle delays in acute ischemic stroke: a workflow-based analysis of emergency department care processes.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Improving the Accuracy of ED Triage Using the Australasian Triage Scale: A Closed-Loop Quality Improvement Project.Cureus · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-powered tiered early warning framework addressing high false alarm rates for in-hospital mortality prediction.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Factors associated with emergency department discharge among patients triaged as resuscitation (CTAS level 1): a retrospective cross-sectional study.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Unpredictable emergency department cardiac arrest: clinical features and the limits of early warning scores and triage acuity.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Mobile triage units for abdominal trauma in sub-Saharan Africa: current evidence, implementation barriers, and strategies for scale-up.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Should we leave paediatric emergency triage to artificial intelligence? A comparison of ChatGPT 4o and Grok 3.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- The Dermatology Fast Track as a Model for Integrated Care Pathways Between Emergency Medicine and Outpatient Specialty Services.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Determinants of Severely Prolonged Emergency Department Stays Among Older Adults: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Emergency department (ED) triage may impact timeliness of care for high-risk conditions. Objective: To determine the association of ED undertriage with delays in care for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), aortic dissection (AD), and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included adult ED patients diagnosed with SAH, AD, or STEMI from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020, from a multicenter, community-based health care delivery system. Data analysis were completed in March 2023 to October 2024. Exposure: Undertriage vs correct triage, defined by operational measures of mistriage. Main Outcomes and Measures: Using a lognormal distribution, the outcomes of interest for patients with SAH and AD were adjusted median time to noncontrast computed tomography (CT) (head CT for patients with SAH, chest CT for patients with AD), antihypertensive medication orders (SAH), and β-blocker orders (AD), and ED length of stay (LOS). For patients with STEMI, outcomes of interest were adjusted median time to electrocardiogram (ECG) and troponin orders. Results: A total of 5929 patients (median [IQR] age, 63.0 [54.0 to 73.0] years; 3876 [65.4%] male) were identified, including 915 with SAH, 480 with AD, and 4534 with STEMI. There were 1129 Asian patients (19.0%), 553 Black patients (9.3%), 889 Hispanic patients (15.0%), and 2906 non-Hispanic White patients (49.0%). Overall, 2175 patients (36.7%) were undertriaged. For patients with SAH, the lognormal estimate for delay in time to head CT was 0.2 (95% CI, 0.0-0.3), or a delay of 2.4 minutes, and for antihypertensive orders, the lognormal estimate was 4.8 (95% CI, 3.6-5.9), or a delay of 33.3 minutes; the lognormal estimate for ED LOS was 0.1 (95% CI, 0.0-0.1), or 7.7 minutes longer. For patients with AD, the lognormal estimate for delays were 0.2 (95% CI, 0.0-0.4), or 8.9 minutes, for chest CT and 0.5 (95% CI, 0.2-0.7), or 17.6 minutes, for β-blocker orders, and ED LOS was 0.2 (95% CI, 0.1-0.3), or 64 minutes longer. For patients with STEMI, differences in time to ECG and troponin orders were not statistically significant, at less than 1 minute, comparing correctly and undertriaged patients. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients diagnosed with SAH, AD, or STEMI, ED undertriage was associated with small but significant delays in key diagnostic and therapeutic orders for patients with SAH and AD but not for patients with STEMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.