ArticleJAMA health forum2025
Racial, Ethnic, and Sex Differences in Need and Receipt of Support for Social Needs Among Veterans.
Article in JAMA health forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health-Related Social Needs and Outpatient and Emergency Department Use Among US Women Veterans: NHIS 2015-2018.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Observational
- Association of Federal and State Level Minimum Wage Legislations and Food Security.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Racial, Ethnic, and Sex Differences in Social Risks and Social Needs Concordance Among Veterans.JAMA network open · 2026Observational
- Health-Related Social Needs Among LGB+ Veterans.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Omission in Discussion Section.JAMA health forum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Health-related social needs, downstream manifestations of social determinants or drivers of health, impact patients' health and well-being. To develop equity-driven social care interventions, health care systems must apply an intersectional equity lens when assessing patients' social needs. Objective: To evaluate racial, ethnic, and sex differences in social needs and receipt of support among veterans receiving health care in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional survey study of VHA primary care patients seen in January or February 2023 was carried out in a national sample of veterans, stratified by race and ethnicity (Black, Hispanic, White), and sex (male, female). Participants were invited by mail to complete a survey online or by mail. Of those invited (N = 38 759), 7095 (18.3%) responded. Data collection occurred from March 2, 2023, through May 9, 2023. Analyses were conducted from February 15, 2024, through July 16, 2024. Exposures: Intersection of self-identified race, ethnicity, and sex. Main Outcomes and Measures: Age-adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) of reported need for and receipt of support across 13 social need domains. Results: Analyses included 6611 respondents representing 939 467 veterans (unweighted No. of participants [weighted %]; 1089 [4.1%] Black women; 1144 [19.4%] Black men; 941 [1.6%] Hispanic women; 1281 [11.3%] Hispanic men; 805 [5.3%] White women; 1351 [58.4%] White men). After age adjustment, compared with White men, Black men had significantly higher aPRs of need for support in all domains except childcare and employment (aPRs ranged from 1.35 [95% CI, 1.09-1.69] for social isolation to 2.73 [95% CI, 1.89-3.95] for managing discrimination). Hispanic women had higher aPRs in 8 domains: childcare (aPR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.19-6.48), discrimination (aPR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.68-4.29), internet (aPR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.17-2.79), housing (aPR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.10-2.99), legal issues (aPR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.02-2.84), loneliness (aPR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.28-2.18), food (aPR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.03-2.35), and social isolation (aPR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.05-1.87). Black women had higher aPRs for discrimination (aPR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.82-3.95), legal issues (aPR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.40-2.97), food (aPR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.28-2.37), loneliness (aPR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.28-2.01), paying for basics (aPR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.15-2.14), and social isolation (aPR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.18-1.87). Hispanic men had higher aPRs for housing (aPR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.18-3.02), legal issues (aPR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.14-2.86), internet (aPR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.13-2.16), and loneliness (aPR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.10-1.88). White women had higher aPRs for childcare (aPR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.36-8.35) and discrimination (aPR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.03-2.50). There was 1 significant difference in receiving support: Black women had a lower prevalence of receiving support for work (aPR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35-0.94). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that there was wide variation in the health-related social need domains in which VHA race, ethnicity, and sex subpopulations reported needing support. Applying an intersectional lens when evaluating social needs lays the groundwork for equity-guided social care interventions in the VHA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.