ArticleSpine deformity2025
The roommate: does double-occupancy rooming impact recovery from pediatric spinal fusion surgery?
Article in Spine deformity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSingle occupancy inpatient recovery rooms are perceived by health care professionals to positively influence patients' experience, while double rooms are associated with higher noise levels, sleep disturbances, and a lack of privacy. These differing physical environments may manifest in differing length of stay, pain scores, and opioid use. When bed space is scarce, identifying ideal populations for double occupancy rooming is important. This study aims to assess how inpatient room assignment impacts recovery time, opioid consumption, and patient reported pain for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing a posterior spinal fusion (PSF).
methodsA retrospective cohort study of AIS patients who underwent PSF from 2011 to 2017 at a single center was conducted. Demographics and baseline radiographic measurements were summarized using appropriate statistics. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, as well as numerical ranking scale (NRS) pain scores and total daily opioid administration, were compared across room types using t tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Chi-squared tests, or Fisher's exact tests, as appropriate. GEE models were constructed to examine the influence of room type and days since surgery on outcomes.
resultsThe cohort included 635 patients: 448 (71%) assigned to a double room and 187 (29%) to a single room. The mean age was 15 ± 2 years and 83% of patients were female. Length of hospital stay, complication rates, 2-year outcomes, inpatient pain scores, and daily opioid usage did not significantly differ between room types (all p > 0.05). Adjusted GEE models revealed no significant associations between room type and pain scores (p = 0.9) or between room type and total opioid dosage (p = 0.95).
conclusionWhen bed space is scarce, double occupancy rooming for pediatric patients after PSF surgery for AIS can serve as a relief valve to continue elective practices without compromising post-operative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40314926What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.