ArticleObesity surgery2025
Integrating Machine Learning and Dynamic Digital Follow-up for Enhanced Prediction of Postoperative Complications in Bariatric Surgery.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Evolution of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery in the Artificial Intelligence Era: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Current Applications and Clinical Implications.Obesity surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in bariatric surgery: a comprehensive systematic review.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in obesity management: clinical evidence, translational gaps, and implementation priorities-a structured narrative review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Risk Score for Stent Outcomes in Post-Bariatric Leak Management: The "Alexandria-Bari-Stent" Tool.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Bariatric Surgery: Optimizing Personalized Decision-Making, Predictive Monitoring, and Postoperative Outcomes.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraditional risk models, such as POSSUM and OS-MS, have limited accuracy in predicting complications after bariatric surgery. Machine learning (ML) offers new opportunities for personalized risk assessment by incorporating artificial intelligence (AI). This study aimed to develop and evaluate two ML-based models: one using preoperative clinical data and another integrating postoperative data from a mobile application.
methodsA prospective study was conducted on 104 bariatric surgery patients at Saint-Pierre University Hospital (September 2022-July 2023). Patients used the "Care4Today" mobile app for real-time postoperative monitoring. Data were analyzed using ML algorithms, with performance evaluated via cross-validation, accuracy, F1 scores, and AUC. A preoperative model used demographic and surgical data, while a postoperative model incorporated symptoms and mobile app-generated alerts.
resultsA total of 104 patients were included. The preoperative model, utilizing Extreme linear discriminant analysis, achieved an accuracy of 75% and an AUC of 64.7%. The postoperative model, using supervised logistic regression with six selected features, demonstrated improved performance with an accuracy of 77.4% and an AUC of 71.5%. A user interface was developed for clinical implementation.
conclusionsML-based predictive models, particularly those integrating dynamic postoperative data, improve risk stratification in bariatric surgery. Real-time mobile health monitoring enhances early complication detection, offering a personalized, adaptable approach beyond traditional static risk models. Future validation with larger datasets is necessary to confirm generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40314925What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.