ArticleOecologia2025
On the need to use proper metrics to detect experimental drought treatments.
Article in Oecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rainfall manipulation experiments are a powerful tool to investigate how drought in isolation or combined with other stresses and disturbance drivers (e.g., fire, herbivory, heatwaves) affects diverse ecological processes. Using passive rainout shelters (intercepting a fixed amount of precipitation) coupled with control plots (receiving ambient precipitation), hundreds of studies have greatly advanced our understanding of drought impacts on plant and soil communities. Despite the existence of guidelines of how to properly design and implement experimental droughts, methodological issues still hinder a correct interpretation of some rainfall manipulation studies. Because of the use of improper metrics to detect drought intensity, it is sometimes unclear whether drought plots really experienced dry conditions and whether control plots experienced near-average mean annual precipitation throughout the experimental period. Here, we reanalyzed three recently published rainfall manipulation studies to illustrate how multi-scalar drought indices (such as SPEI) can be used to better quantify the intensity of the experimental drought imposed and to place it in the historical climate context of each studied area. We also provide additional guidelines to improve the experimental design of future rainfall manipulation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40314860What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.