ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Diagnostic accuracy of iodine quantification and material density imaging with rapid Kilovoltage-switching DECT for small hyperattenuating renal lesions.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess accuracy of MDI and iodine quantification in distinguishing enhancing renal masses from hyperattenuating cysts, compared with conventional attenuation measurements, given that differentiation between these entities can influence follow-up imaging strategies and surgical decision-making, and to investigate the optimal threshold of iodine concentration using rapid kilovoltage-switching DECT (rsDECT). MATERIALS AND
methodsRetrospective study enrolled 126 renal lesions 1-4 cm in size with 10-70 attenuation on pre-contrast CT in patients who underwent rsDECT during the portovenous phase. Two reading sessions (true unenhanced (TUE) + post-contrast (PC) + MDI images versus MDI only images) for the visual assessment of renal mass enhancement were done (with at least 1-month time gap). Measurement of attenuation and iodine concentration within each renal lesion was recorded. Diagnostic accuracies and a threshold of each quantitative parameters were evaluated. Final diagnosis of renal lesions was based on pathological or imaging criteria.
resultsAccuracy of MDI images were 90.5% with TUE + PC + MDI and 88.9% with MDI only. AUC of VUE HU, TUE HU, PC HU, PC VUE HU, PC-TUE HU, absolute and normalized iodine concentration were 0.87, 0.82, 0.96, 0.95, 0.96, 0.97 and 0.95 (all p < 0.001). The optimal absolute iodine concentration threshold was 1.6 mg I/mL, with 91% sensitivity and 92% specificity. This threshold outperformed 0.5 mg I/mL showing 100% sensitivity, 29% specificity) and 2.0 mg I/mL showing 71% sensitivity, 97% specificity.
conclusionIn characterization of a small (< 4 cm) hyperattenuating renal lesion identified on abdominal CT, post processing MDI with iodine quantification has better or comparable accuracy to attenuation measurement and the specificity of iodine concentration using rsDECT improves with a threshold higher than 0.5 mg I/mL. This could enhance diagnostic workflows for renal lesion assessment using MDI and offer the potential to omit TUE scanning, thereby reducing patient radiation exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.