Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40314809›Full record

Trial reportArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025

Cost analysis of nurse-lead telephone follow-ups after benign hysterectomy: a randomized, single-blinded, four-arm, controlled multicenter trial.

Gulnara Kassymova, Thomas Davidson, Gunilla Sydsjö, Ninnie Borendal Wodlin, Lena Nilsson, Preben Kjølhede

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01526668 (A Randomized Study Comparing Four Different Postoperative Follow-up Strategies for Improved Postoperative Recovery After Benign Hysterectomy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01526668 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Study Comparing Four Different Postoperative Follow-up Strategies for Improved Postoperative Recovery After Benign Hysterectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, LinkoepingRan2011 to 2018Enrolled525ConditionsHysterectomy, Genital Diseases, Female, PainArmsFollow-up strategy, No contact after discharge
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gulnara KassymovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Linköping, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 58245, Linköping, Sweden. Gulnara@vackerman.se.ORCID 0000-0002-5386-932X
Thomas DavidsonDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9393-2573
Gunilla SydsjöDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Linköping, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 58245, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4296-4038
Ninnie Borendal WodlinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Linköping, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 58245, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3730-7722
Lena NilssonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7489-9077
Preben KjølhedeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Linköping, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 58245, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5702-4116

Funding

Futurum - the Academy of Health and Care, Region Jönköping Council FUTURUM-487481, FUTURUM 579171Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden FORSS-155141; FORSS-222211; FORSS-308441, FORSS-387761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of the study was to evaluate the health economics of nurse-led telephone follow-up contacts (TFUs) within six weeks after benign hysterectomy in a societal perspective, using a cost minimization analysis model.

methodsA randomized, single-blinded, controlled, Swedish multicenter study comprising 487 women undergoing benign hysterectomy. The women were allocated 1:1:1:1 to either Group A (no TFUs), Group B (one clinically structured TFU the day after discharge), Group C (as B, but with additional TFUs once weekly for six weeks, in total six TFUs), or Group D (as C, but by applying a coaching technique). Time consumption for planned TFUs, informal care, and the number of unplanned telephone contacts and visits were recorded. Costs were assessed using a cost-per-patient price list for Linköping University Hospital.

resultsThe total cost per patient more than doubled in the groups with repeated TFUs (Groups C and D) compared with no TFUs (Group A). Group D demonstrated fewer unplanned telephone contacts and lower informal care costs. Group B, with only one TFU, exhibited the highest time consumption for TFU. The additional costs of six TFUs, with or without coaching, substantially increased the costs. The coaching TFU group (Group D) had the lowest cost for informal care.

conclusionTFUs appeared to be costly and an inefficient way of using healthcare resources after benign hysterectomy. The coaching TFU seemed to reduce unplanned telephone contacts and lower informal care costs. Careful consideration of the costs and the impact on clinical outcomes is important before implementing TFU after surgery.

trial registrationThis study is registered retrospectively in ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT01526668 on January 27, 2012. Date of enrollment of first patient: October 11; 2011.

Indexed as

AftercareHysterectomyTelephoneAdultCosts and Cost AnalysisFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSingle-Blind MethodSwedenCost minimization analysisHealthcareHysterectomyPatient-centered careTelephone follow-up

Identifiers

PMID40314809
PMCPMC12334415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.