ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2025
Factors associated with actionable gene aberrations in pancreatic cancer based on the C-CAT database.
Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision medicine strategy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.ESMO open · 2025Article
- Nationwide Real-World Usage of Blood-Based (Liquid) Biomarker Testing in Japan.Cancer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests are increasingly used to explore the genomically matched therapies for solid tumors. The aim of this study is to investigate factors associated with actionable gene aberrations in pancreatic cancer (PC) using real-world data from the Center for Advanced Cancer Genome Therapy (C-CAT) database.
methodsAmong 6768 patients with unresectable and recurrent PC registered in the C-CAT database between June 2019 and July 2023, we identified 4628 patients who underwent tissue-based CGP tests using either FoundationOne
resultsThe cohort included 3,554 patients who underwent F1CDx and 1128 NOP, with surgical specimens in 50% of the cases. Adenocarcinoma was the predominant subtype (95%), and KRAS mutations were found in 90%. The overall incidence of actionable gene aberrations was 27%. The most common gene abnormalities were BRCA2 (3.4%), followed by ATM (2.9%), ERBB2 (2.8%), PIK3 CA (2.5%), and BRAF (1.9%). Multivariable analysis revealed that acinar cell carcinoma (ACC) (Odds ratio [OR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-2.67), KRAS wild type (KRAS
conclusionsActionable gene aberrations were more likely in cases of ACC, KRAS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.