Observational studyJournal of gastroenterology2025
Current status and trends in ERCP and post-ERCP pancreatitis in Japan: a nationwide observational study.
Observational study in Journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two minimally invasive surgical approaches for the treatment of common bile duct stones with gallbladder stones: a retrospective study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Nationwide epidemiological survey of acute pancreatitis in Japan, 2021: the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and revised clinical guidelines.Journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is indispensable for the management of biliary and pancreatic diseases but carries a high risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). This study aimed to clarify the current status and temporal trends of ERCP and PEP in Japan, including preventive measures.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from April 1, 2016, to March 31, 2023. Trend analyses were performed for ERCP, PEP, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and protease inhibitors. Additionally, factors associated with PEP and severe PEP were evaluated.
resultsAmong the 1,073,513 ERCP cases, PEP and severe PEP incidences were 85,212 (7.9%) and 4841 cases (0.5%), respectively. The mortality rate was 0.5% for severe PEP and 0.2% for non-severe cases. The number of ERCP procedures and the proportion of therapeutic ERCP increased over time. The incidence of PEP declined from 9.1% in the fiscal year 2016-2017 to 6.4% in the fiscal year 2022, while the incidence of severe PEP decreased from 0.5 to 0.33% over the same period. The usage rate of rectal NSAIDs increased from 16.4 to 27.6%, whereas that of protease inhibitors decreased from 70.5 to 53.5%. The administration of rectal NSAIDs at doses of 20-25 mg and 50 mg was associated with a reduced risk of severe PEP.
conclusionsThe number of ERCP procedures and the proportion of therapeutic ERCP have increased, whereas the incidences of PEP and severe PEP have decreased. Rectal NSAIDs may prevent the progression of PEP to severe disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.