Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40314711›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025

Deep learning-based automatic cranial implant design through direct defect shape prediction and its comparison study.

Afaque Rafique Memon, Haochen Shi, Tarique Rafique Memon, Jan Egger, Xiaojun Chen

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Afaque Rafique Memon *School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Haochen Shi *School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Tarique Rafique MemonDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science and Technology, Nawabshah, Sindh, Pakistan.
Jan EggerInstitute of Computer Graphics and Vision, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Xiaojun ChenSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. xiaojunchen@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0298-4491

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82330063Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 22Y11911700Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 24490710300Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 24TS1413000Shanghai Jiao Tong University Foundation on Medical and Technological Joint Science Research YG2023ZD15Shanghai Jiao Tong University Foundation on Medical and Technological Joint Science Research YG2023ZD19Shanghai Jiao Tong University Foundation on Medical and Technological Joint Science Research YG2024QNA23Shanghai Jiao Tong University Foundation on Medical and Technological Joint Science Research YG2024QNB26Shanghai Leading Talent Plan BJKJ2024003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defects to human crania are one kind of head bone damages, and cranial implants can be used to repair the defected crania. The automation of the implant design process is crucial in reducing the corresponding therapy time. Taking the cranial implant design problem as a special kind of shape completion task, an automatic cranial implant design workflow is proposed, which consists of a deep neural network for the direct shape prediction of the missing part of the defective cranium and conventional post-processing steps to refine the automatically generated implant. To evaluate the proposed workflow, we employ cross-validation and report an average Dice Similarity Score and boundary Dice Similarity Score of 0.81 and 0.81, respectively. We also measure the surface distance error using the 95th quantile of the Hausdorff Distance, which yields an average of 3.01 mm. Comparison with the manual cranial implant design procedure also revealed the convenience of the proposed workflow. In addition, a plugin is developed for 3D Slicer, which implements the proposed automatic cranial implant design workflow and can facilitate the end-users.

Indexed as

Deep LearningProstheses and ImplantsProsthesis DesignSkullHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalNeural Networks, Computer3D medical imagingAutomatic implant designDeep learningDefect shape predictionImplant customizationMedical AI algorithms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.