ArticleIrish journal of medical science2025
Valid consent in the acute hospital setting: perspectives of nursing and medical professionals from a survey-based study.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn healthcare, consent refers to the act of granting permission or agreement for treatment and care, investigation, receiving or utilising a service, or participating in research or teaching. Consent should be an ongoing process that involves clear communication about the proposed intervention, including its nature, benefits, and potential risks.
aimThis survey-based study gathered experiences from junior doctors and nurses in a large acute teaching hospital about current consent practices and suggestions for improvement.
methodTwo surveys were developed and distributed to junior doctors in 2022 and nurses in 2023.
resultsThe response rate for junior doctors (n = 58) was 21% (interns) and 57% (senior house officers) and 10% of the total nursing population responded (n = 184). Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used to analyse the results. Both junior doctors and nursing professionals believed there were areas for improvement in terms of consent processes and practices including in relation to better information for patients and more education and training for healthcare professionals.
conclusionsThe process of informed consent is central in the planning and provision of safe, effective person-centred healthcare as it encompasses healthcare professionals and patients communicating about and together deciding on and agreeing to medical interventions. This survey-based study looked at the experiences, attitudes, and perceived needs of junior doctors and nursing professionals in relation to the informed consent process in clinical practice at an acute hospital and informed the development of recommendations for improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.