ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
A fast and robust geometric point cloud registration model for orthopedic surgery with noisy and incomplete data.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based femoral reconstruction from intraoperative point clouds for enhanced knee arthroplasty registration.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAccurate registration of partial-to-partial point clouds is crucial in computer-assisted orthopedic surgery but faces challenges due to incomplete data, noise, and partial overlap. This paper proposes a novel geometric fast registration (GFR) model that addresses these issues through three core modules: point extractor registration (PER), dual attention transformer (DAT), and geometric feature matching (GFM).
methodsPER operates within the frequency domain to enhance point cloud data by attenuating noise and reconstructing incomplete regions. DAT augments feature representation by correlating independent features from source and target point clouds, improving model expressiveness. GFM identifies geometrically consistent point pairs, completing missing data and refining registration accuracy.
resultsWe conducted experiments using the clinical bone dataset of 1432 distinct human skeletal samples, comprising ribs, scapulae, and fibula. The proposed model exhibited remarkable robustness and versatility, demonstrating consistent performance across diverse bone structures. When evaluated to noisy, partial-to-partial point clouds with incomplete bone data, the model achieved a mean squared error of 3.57 for rotation and a mean absolute error of 1.29. The mean squared error for translation was 0.002, with a mean absolute error of 0.038.
conclusionOur proposed GFR model exhibits exceptional speed and universality, effectively handling point clouds with defects, noise, and partial overlap. Extensive experiments conducted on bone datasets demonstrate the superior performance of our model compared to state-of-the-art methods. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/xzh128/PER .
Indexed as
Identifiers
40314701What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.