ReviewRadiology. Imaging cancer2025
Quantitative Ablation Confirmation Methods in Percutaneous Thermal Ablation of Malignant Liver Tumors: Technical Insights, Clinical Evidence, and Future Outlook.
Review in Radiology. Imaging cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying Functional Liver Volume Loss after CT-guided Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: A COVER-ALL Trial Post Hoc Analysis.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2026Trial
- AI-driven ablative margin assessment after HCC radiofrequency ablation: a case-control feasibility study.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Percutaneous Cryoablation Versus Microwave Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparative Study of Safety and Oncologic Outcomes.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2026Article
- Intra-procedural CT control versus ultrasound only in ultrasound-guided thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases: a single-centre cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Intratumoural Contrast Tagging During CT-Hepatic Arteriography-Guided Microwave Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases (t-CTHA) to Enhance Tumour Targeting and Margin Assessment.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- The effects of measurement errors on minimum ablative margins after thermal ablation of liver tumors: a simulation study.CVIR oncology · 2026Article
- Angiography-Assisted Cone-Beam CT-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Single-Center Workflow and Early Outcomes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Protecting organs-at-risk in cancer therapies through temporary organ displacement: a comprehensive review.Oncology reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation is an established local curative-intent treatment technique for the treatment of primary and secondary malignant liver tumors. Whereas margin assessment after surgical resection can be accomplished with microscopic examination of the resected specimen, margin assessment after percutaneous thermal ablation relies on cross-sectional imaging. The critical measure of technical success is the minimal ablative margin (MAM), defined as the minimum distance between the tumor and the edge of the ablation zone. Traditionally, the MAM has been assessed qualitatively using anatomic landmarks, which has suboptimal accuracy and reproducibility and is prone to operator bias. Consequently, specialized software-based methods have been developed to standardize and automate MAM quantification. In this review, the authors discuss the technical components of such methods, including image acquisition, segmentation, registration, and MAM computation, define the sources of measurement error, describe available software solutions in terms of image processing techniques and modes of integration, and outline the current clinical evidence, which strongly supports the use of such dedicated software. Finally, the authors discuss current logistical and financial barriers to widespread use of ablation confirmation methods as well as potential solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.