ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Impact of COVID-19 on Prenatal Diagnosis and Surgical Outcomes of Congenital Heart Disease: Fetal Heart Society and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Collaborative Study.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Dual Role of Neonatal Pulse Oximetry Screening and Fetal Echocardiography in Congenital Heart Disease Detection Around the World.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Review
- Public Reporting and Case Selection in Congenital Heart Surgery: Signals From a Multicenter Observational Study.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFetal echocardiography is the mainstay of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease. The COVID-19 pandemic led to shifts in triage of prenatal services. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on prenatal diagnosis, surgical outcomes, and disparities in neonatal critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) management in the United States during the pandemic's first year. METHODS AND
resultsA multi-institutional retrospective cohort study compared neonatal CCHD outcomes (requiring surgery within 60 days of birth) 1 year prior (prepandemic era) and during the peak pandemic era, supplemented by a Fetal Heart Society survey assessing regional practice changes. Data on prenatal diagnosis, demographics, outcomes, and 2020 state Area Deprivation Index were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum and χ
conclusionsAlthough pandemic-driven care delivery adjustments affected perinatal cardiology referrals and triage, prenatal diagnosis, perioperative outcomes, and survival remained robust. The management of CCHD demonstrates health care resilience, maintaining core prenatal and perioperative care. Regional variations highlight the need for targeted strategies to address disparities during health care crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.