Observational studyJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2025
Real-world effectiveness of burosumab vs oral phosphate and active vitamin D in adults with X-linked hypophosphatemia.
Observational study in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03651505 (X-linked Hypophosphatemia Disease Monitoring Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
X-linked Hypophosphatemia Disease Monitoring Program (XLH-DMP)
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health-Related Quality of Life in Children with X-Linked Hypophosphatemia Treated with Burosumab: Real-World Data from a German-Swiss Study.Calcified tissue international · 2026Observational
- Burosumab improves alkaline phosphatase and rickets severity in X-linked hypophosphatemia: 3-year SUNFLOWER analysis.Bone reports · 2026Article
- FGF23 - A hormone produced by bone and has many faces.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
- Real-world effectiveness of burosumab across age groups: X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) Disease Monitoring Program.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Article
- Insight into Natural History and Phenotype in Untreated Adults with X-Linked Hypophosphatemia.Calcified tissue international · 2026Article
- Article
- Health-related quality of life in French adults with X-linked hypophosphatemia: real-world data from the International XLH Registry.JBMR plus · 2026Article
- Pain medication use in patients with X-linked hypophosphatemia treated with burosumab: a retrospective real-world study.JBMR plus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH), PHEX gene variants lead to elevated FGF23 production, resulting in hypophosphatemia, osteomalacia, osteomalacia-related fractures, osteoarthritis, enthesopathy, spinal stenosis, and symptoms of pain, stiffness, and decreased physical function. Burosumab is an anti-FGF23 monoclonal Ab approved for XLH treatment. Randomized studies comparing oral phosphate/active vitamin D (Pi/D) to burosumab in adults are lacking. This analysis, which utilized real-world data from the prospective, Americas-based XLH Disease Monitoring Program (NCT03651505), evaluated the effectiveness of burosumab vs Pi/D, based on changes from baseline to the year 1 visit in serum phosphate, 1,25(OH)2D, PTH, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS PF), and Timed Up and Go performance outcome. Two cohorts of adults with XLH who either began burosumab between baseline and the year 1 visit (n = 65) or were on Pi/D (n = 74) at study entry and did not receive burosumab were included. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was employed to adjust for potential confounding due to baseline cohort differences. At the year 1 visit, mean (SE) change from baseline was significant for burosumab vs Pi/D in serum phosphate (0.78 [0.08] vs 0.15 [0.14] mg/dL; p < .001), 1,25(OH)2D (19.41 [3.39] vs 5.49 [3.43] pg/mL; p = .011), PTH (-13.82 [5.00] vs 11.79 [8.10] pg/mL; p = .006), WOMAC pain (-7.50 [2.34] vs 4.47 [3.23]; p = .004), WOMAC physical function (-5.68 [1.96] vs 6.77 [4.85]; p = .006), and WOMAC total (-7.78 [2.06] vs 3.15 [3.37]; p = .005) scores, PROMIS PF (1.51 [0.73] vs -1.64 [1.11], p = .018), and TUG (-1.19 [0.42] vs 0.55 [0.43] s, p = .011). A trend towards improved WOMAC stiffness was observed for burosumab (-10.16 [2.85] vs -1.79 [3.68]; p = .086). In this real-world analysis of adults with XLH, burosumab treatment was associated with improved biochemical parameters, pain, physical function, and mobility compared with Pi/D.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.