Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40314104›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2025

Interbrain coupling during language learning contributes to learning outcomes.

Simone G Shamay-Tsoory, Anna Markovich, Andrey Markus, Tali Bitan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Simone G Shamay-TsooryDepartment of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1088-5212
Anna MarkovichDepartment of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel.
Andrey MarkusDepartment of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel.
Tali BitanDepartment of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel.

Funding

European Research Council (ERC)European UnionResearch and Innovation Programme 101020091 DLV-101020091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While knowledge and skill acquisition frequently occur in social interactions, the predominant focus of existing research remains centred on individual learning. Here, we investigate whether social interaction enhances language learning, and whether interbrain coupling changes across learning sessions. We utilized functional near-infrared spectroscopy to assess teacher-learner dyads engaging in a two-session training on a set of words and their plural inflections in a novel language. We compared a group trained with mutual communication with a noninteractive group, in which the learner could see and hear the teacher, but the teacher was unable to see or hear the learner (one-way mirror). Results revealed that compared to the No-interaction group, the Interaction group exhibited faster reaction times for vocabulary recognition and morphological inflections for the first session. The neuroimaging data revealed that interbrain coupling between the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) of the learner and the right IFG of the teacher positively predicted vocabulary accuracy in the first but not in the second session. The results collectively suggest that IFG interbrain coupling plays an essential role in the initial stages of learning, highlighting the significant impact of social interaction in enhancing learning, especially during the early phases of learning.

Indexed as

BrainLanguageLearningSocial InteractionAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredVocabularyYoung Adulthyperscanninginferior frontal gyrusinterbrain couplinglearningsocial interactions

Identifiers

PMID40314104
PMCPMC12151009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.