Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40314097›Full record

ReviewEquine veterinary journal2025

Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing and managing deep digital flexor tendinopathy in equine athletes: Insights, advances and future directions.

Alexandra Scharf, Elizabeth Acutt, Kathryn Bills, Natasha Werpy

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Equine veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexandra ScharfDepartment of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1270-0998
Elizabeth AcuttDepartment of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9493-6026
Kathryn BillsDepartment of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0857-9363
Natasha WerpyEquine Diagnostic Imaging, Inc., Archer, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4230-7831

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep digital flexor (DDF) tendinopathy is a significant cause of lameness and poor performance in equine athletes with substantial implications for their return to athletic performance. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly integrated into the diagnostic workup of horses with foot pain and has revolutionised the diagnosis and management of these injuries. This review discusses the principles of MRI in the context of deep digital flexor tendon (DDFT) injury, comparing high-field and low-field systems and highlighting the clinical relevance of technical parameters, including field strength and sequence selection, in achieving an accurate diagnosis. This review also critically evaluates how different configurations and/or imaging features of tendon lesions may impact patient prognosis, considers the complementary role of computed tomography and ultrasonography in cases where MRI may not be feasible, and discusses emerging imaging techniques including positron emission tomography (PET)-MRI and quantitative MRI. Lastly, this review underscores the importance of serial imaging to monitor lesion progression and guide rehabilitation, while identifying knowledge gaps and proposing future research directions. Ultimately, a multidisciplinary approach incorporating advanced imaging and tailored rehabilitation is essential to improving clinical outcomes in horses with DDFT injuries.

Indexed as

Horse DiseasesMagnetic Resonance ImagingTendinopathyAnimalsHorsesTendon InjurieshorseMRItendinopathytendon

Identifiers

PMID40314097
PMCPMC12326952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.