Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40314057›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

The Efficacy and Safety of Using Chamomile Products During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period.

Tess Ferguson, Barbara Gordon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tess FergusonObstetrics and Gynecology, Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine, Meridian, USA.
Barbara GordonNutrition and Dietetics, Idaho State University, Meridian, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herbal remedies have been a mainstay of medicine for thousands of years. This systematic literature review investigated the efficacy and safety of chamomile herbal products among peripartum or postpartum women. Four peer-reviewed databases were searched through June 2024. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol was implemented, and the quality of studies was assessed using Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Assessment tools. A total of 23 studies (16 clinical trials and seven observational studies involving 2,065 women from nine countries) were included in this review. The development of clinical practice recommendations on using chamomile products during pregnancy is not feasible based on the available evidence, indicating the need for randomized, double-blind placebo control studies with larger study populations and consistent study protocols (e.g., type and dosage of chamomile ingested). Limitations of this review include its small sample size and the inclusion of multiple studies by the same research teams; these findings likely reflect insights from the same cohorts of women. Some studies reported clinically significant findings that were not statistically significant. Thus, despite weak evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of chamomile usage during pregnancy, a provider might still share the potential benefits and risks of using chamomile products with patients who use or desire to use chamomile products.

Indexed as

and pregnancychamomilecomplementary and alternative medicine (cam)herbal remedieshomeopathic treatmentslabor pain managmentnausea and vomiting in pregnancypostpartum depressionpostpartum mental healthwomens health

Identifiers

PMID40314057
PMCPMC12045525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.