ArticleCureus2025
Impact of an Obstetrical Emergency Simulation Learning Module on Midwifery Students' Competency: A Non-randomized Control Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Obstetrical emergencies are multifaceted and complex, and their urgency demands a combination of clinical skills. As a result, it is generally observed that minimum teaching takes place during these emergencies. This study aimed to formulate a simulation learning module centered on chosen obstetrical emergencies and evaluate its efficacy in measuring the competency of undergraduate midwifery students. Design and participants The study utilized a non-randomized time series interventional research design among 188 midwifery students (control group 90, intervention group 98). A hybrid simulation was administered to the intervention group. The research employed several tools: a proforma for background variables, a structured questionnaire, and the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) of selected obstetrical emergencies. Results In the present study, 98% of participants in the control group demonstrated inadequate competency in the pretest, post-test I, and post-test II. In contrast, all participants (100%) in the intervention group had adequate competency followed by moderately adequate competency in the post-test I and post-test II. The study reported that there was a significant difference between the assessments (pretest, post-test-I, post-test-II) in the knowledge and skills of the interventional group with the effect size (eta squared=0.70, 0.99), respectively. The results showed a statistically significant difference (P<0.001) in overall competency scores between the control and intervention groups at pretest, with a moderate effect size (Cohen's d=0.68). The intervention group demonstrated substantial improvements at post-test I (Cohen's d=23.61) and post-test II (Cohen's d=15.83). Conclusion Hybrid simulation is an appropriate method for equipping healthcare providers to gain and maintain competence in managing obstetric emergencies. Therefore, simulation must be incorporated into the curriculum to allow students to immerse themselves in their clinical learning, which enhances their communication, confidence, and satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.