ArticleOrthopedic reviews2025
A retrospective review of MagnetOs Easypack Putty
Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A single-arm retrospective feasibility study of biphasic calcium phosphate bone graft with submicron surface topography in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures 6 months postoperative.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
- A Review of Synthetic Bone Grafts in Lumbar Interbody Fusion.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Systematic Review of Metal Composite Bone Grafts in Preclinical Spinal Fusion Models.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spinal fusion surgeries remain a successful treatment for degenerative disc disease. While autograft is considered the gold standard bone graft, synthetic bone void fillers are increasingly used to limit donor site morbidity while giving sufficient graft volume. Methods: This retrospective clinical study evaluates MagnetOs Easypack Putty Results: The primary endpoint of CT-based fusion was 94.4% (34/36 levels) based on the presence of bridging bone or locked pseudoarthrosis at 12 months. The high fusion rate was accompanied by consistent improvement in pain scores. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores decreased an average of 25% from 5.3/10 pre-operatively to 2.8/10 at 12 months post-operative, and all subjects who reported pre-operative back or leg pain reported improved pain post-operatively. Although the patient population included risk factors and comorbidities, the fusion rate remained high, and no device-related adverse events (AEs) were observed. Conclusions: The high fusion rate and favorable safety profile support the performance of MagnetOs Easypack Putty for standalone use without autograft in interbody fusion procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.