ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2025
XenoBug: machine learning-based tool to predict pollutant-degrading enzymes from environmental metagenomes.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding extremophiles: insights from bioinformatics, machine learning, and data-driven approaches.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Molecular Monitoring in Soil Bioremediation: From Genetic Potential to Verified Pathway Operation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Diagnosing soil bioremediation failure: evidence-weighted pathways from mechanism to field closure.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- AI Based Predictive Modelling for Internal Quality Control: A Machine Learning Approach Using Altair RapidMiner.EJIFCC · 2025Article
- Review
- Harnessing Engineered Microbial Consortia for Xenobiotic Bioremediation: Integrating Multi-Omics and AI for Next-Generation Wastewater Treatment.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Review
- Machine learning reveals microbial interactions driving plastic degradation across plastisphere environments.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Application of machine learning-based methods to identify novel bacterial enzymes capable of degrading a wide range of xenobiotics offers enormous potential for bioremediation of toxic and carcinogenic recalcitrant xenobiotics such as pesticides, plastics, petroleum, and pharmacological products that adversely impact ecology and health. Using 6814 diverse substrates involved in ∼141 200 biochemical reactions, we have developed 'XenoBug', a machine learning-based tool that predicts bacterial enzymes, enzymatic reaction, the species capable of biodegrading xenobiotics, and the metagenomic source of the predicted enzymes. For training, a hybrid feature set was used that comprises 1603 molecular descriptors and linear and circular fingerprints. It also includes enzyme datasets consisting of ∼3.3 million enzyme sequences derived from an environmental metagenome database and ∼16 million enzymes from ∼38 000 bacterial genomes. For different reaction classes, XenoBug shows very high binary accuracies (>0.75) and F1 scores (>0.62). XenoBug is also validated on a set of diverse classes of xenobiotics such as pesticides, environmental pollutants, pharmacological products, and hydrocarbons known to be degraded by the bacterial enzymes. XenoBug predicted known as well as previously unreported metabolic enzymes for the degradation of molecules in the validation set, thus showing its broad utility to predict the metabolism of any input xenobiotic molecules. XenoBug is available on: https://metabiosys.iiserb.ac.in/xenobug.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.