ReviewThe Ulster medical journal2025
Spontaneous rupture of uterine artery in a non-pregnant woman with adenomyosis: a case report and review of current literature.
Review in The Ulster medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous rupture of a uterine artery is a rare occurrence and more often associated with postpartum haemorrhage. It is even more unusual outside pregnancy. In this report, we will describe a case of spontaneous uterine artery rupture in a 40-year-old non-pregnant female with adenomyosis who presented with severe vaginal bleeding. We will also review the aetiology of rupture of uterine artery based on the current literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40313988PMC12042855What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.