ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Efgartigimod as a fast-acting treatment in generalized very-late-onset myasthenia gravis.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Very late-onset myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical severity and long-term outcomes.European geriatric medicine · 2026Review
- Italian recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of myasthenia gravis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Pharmacological and speech-language pathology management of dysphagia in patients with myasthenia gravis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of efgartigimod in very-late-onset myasthenia gravis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Efgartigimod-alfa therapy in acetylcholine receptor antibody myasthenia gravis: Romanian experience.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Efgartigimod for Generalized Myasthenia Gravis and Beyond: A Narrative Review of Its Pharmacological Profile, Clinical Utility, and Expanding Applications.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Efgartigimod for generalized myasthenia gravis in the extreme elderly (≥80 years): a multicenter retrospective real-world study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Safety profile of complement C5 inhibitors and FcRn inhibitors in the treatment of myasthenia gravis: analysis of the FAERS database and disease-gene interaction network.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Efgartigimod for generalized myasthenia gravis: a comprehensive review of clinical evidence and future perspectives.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Efgartigimod (EFG), a neonatal Fc receptor antagonist that facilitates the degradation of pathogenic immunoglobulin G, is approved for the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis (MG). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EFG in patients with very-late-onset myasthenia gravis (VLOMG). Methods: This study enrolled 15 consecutive patients diagnosed with VLOMG who received EFG treatment. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as dynamic changes in the MG-specific activities of daily living (MG-ADL) score and quantitative MG (QMG) score, were systematically recorded. Results: Patients were stratified into two groups: a worse group (n = 8) and a new-diagnosed group (n = 7), the latter of which included 5 patients who had received monotherapy with pyridostigmine (Py) prior to EFG. At week 5, the mean changes in MG-ADL scores were -4.9 ± 3.3 in the overall VLOMG cohort, -6.1 ± 3.1 in the new-diagnosed group, -6.6 ± 3.6 in the mono-Py subgroup, and -3.8 ± 3.2 in the worse group. The clinical meaningful improvement (CMI) rate was 86.7% (13/15) in the overall cohort, 75.0% (6/8) in the worse group, and 100.0% (7/7) in the new-diagnosed group. During a mean follow-up time of 39.2 ± 16.2 weeks, symptoms remained stable in responsive patients, with various treatment strategies implemented following the fast-acting treatment of EFG. No adverse drug reactions were reported in this cohort. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that EFG is an effective and safe treatment for patients with VLOMG. EFG exhibits potential as an early, fast-acting treatment and may confer sustained clinical benefits in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.