Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40313874›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025

Exploring the

Marcel Meyerheim, Foteini Panagiotidou, Eleni Georgiadi, Dimitrios Soudris, Georgios Stamatakos, Norbert Graf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marcel MeyerheimPediatric Oncology and Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Foteini PanagiotidouIn Silico Oncology and In Silico Medicine Group, Institute of Communication and Computer Systems, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Eleni GeorgiadiIn Silico Oncology and In Silico Medicine Group, Institute of Communication and Computer Systems, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Dimitrios SoudrisIn Silico Oncology and In Silico Medicine Group, Institute of Communication and Computer Systems, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Georgios StamatakosIn Silico Oncology and In Silico Medicine Group, Institute of Communication and Computer Systems, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Norbert GrafPediatric Oncology and Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Nephroblastoma or Wilms' tumor is the most prevalent type of renal tumor in pediatric oncology. Although the overall survival rate for this condition is excellent today (∼90%), there have been no significant improvements over the past two decades. In silico models aim to simulate tumor progression and treatment responses over time; they hold immense potential for enhancing the predictive accuracy and optimizing treatment protocols as they are inspired by the digital twin paradigm. Methods: The present study uses T2-weighted magnetic resonance images, chemotherapy treatment plans, and post-surgical histological profiles from three patients enrolled in the SIOP 2001/GPOH clinical trial, where each patient represents a distinct clinically assessed risk group. We investigated the clinical adaptation of the Nephroblastoma Oncosimulator to the datasets from these patients with the goal of deriving appropriate value distributions of the model input parameters that enable accurate prediction of tumor volume reduction in response to preoperative chemotherapy. Results: Our primary focus was on the total cell kill ratio as a parameter reflecting treatment effectiveness. We derived the distribution of this parameter for one patient from each risk group: low ( Discussion: The present work establishes a foundation for further studies using available retrospective datasets and additional patients per risk group. These efforts are expected to help validate the findings, advance model development, and extend this mechanistic multiscale discretized cancer model. However, clinical validation is ultimately required to assess the potential uses of the model in clinical decision-support systems.

Indexed as

clinical adaptationdecision-support systemin silico medicinemultiscale cancer modelingNephroblastoma Oncosimulator

Identifiers

PMID40313874
PMCPMC12043452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.