ReviewJACS Au2025
Nanopore Environmental Analysis.
Review in JACS Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sub-Nanomolar Detection and Discrimination of Microcystin Congeners Using Aerolysin Nanopores.ACS nano · 2026Article
- Large-Diameter DNA-Scaffolded Nanopores Enabled by Loosely Packed Peptides for Single-Molecule Sensing.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Advancements and Emerging Trends in the Detection of Sweet Potato Diseases: A Comprehensive Review.ACS omega · 2026Review
- DNA Origami and Their Application in Biosensors.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Influence of grinding particle size on the non-targeted analysis of semivolatile organic pollutants in soil.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- De Novo Design of α-helical Peptide Nanopores for Single-Molecule Detection Using Helix Packing Motifs.ACS nano · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As global pollution continues to escalate, timely and accurate monitoring is essential for guiding pollution governance and safeguarding public health. The increasing diversity of pollutants across environmental matrices poses a significant challenge for instrumental analysis methods, which often require labor-intensive and time-consuming sample pretreatment. Nanopore technology, an emerging single-molecule technique, presents a promising solution by enabling the rapid identification of multiple targets within complex mixtures with minimal sample preparation. A wide range of pollutants have been characterized using natural biological nanopores or artificial solid-state nanopores, and their distinct advantages include simple sample preparation, high sensitivity, and rapid onsite analysis. In particular, long-read nanopore sequencing has led to dramatic improvements in the analyses of environmental microbial communities, allows species-level taxonomic assignment using amplicon sequencing, and simplifies the assembly of metagenomes. In this Perspective, we review the latest advancements in analyzing chemical and biological pollutants through nanopore sensing and sequencing techniques. We also explore the challenges that remain in this rapidly evolving field and provide an outlook on the potential for nanopore environmental analysis to transform pollution monitoring, risk assessment, and public health protection.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.