ArticleFood science & nutrition2025
Traceability and Adulteration Analysis of Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium Based on "Digital Identity Card" and UHPLC-QTOF-MS Analysis.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- CounterfeitFood science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Identification of Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium (Chenpi) From Different Cultivars via LC-MS/MS and UPLC Coupled With Multivariate Chemometrics Analysis.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Sinomenii caulis and Menispermi rhizoma Based on Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography and Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Quadrupole Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry.Analytical science advances · 2025Article
- A New Method for Identification of Ginseng Radix et Rhizoma Adulterated with Panacis Quinquefolii Radix.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to improve the identification efficiency, strengthen quality control, and realize the quick traceability and adulteration analysis of Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium (CRP) and Xinhui's Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium (XCRP, geoauthentic herb), UHPLC-QTOF-MS combined with "digital identity card" was used to explore digital identification of CRP. UHPLC-QTOF-MS chemical analysis was conducted on CRP from different origins, and after quantized processing, the shared ions were extracted from different batches of CRP from the same origin as the "ions representation" of CRP of the same origin. Further, the data set of unique ions of each origin relative to other origins was screened out as "digital identity card" of CRP from each origin. In addition, the CRPs that do not originated from Xinhui were mixed and prepared as reference samples. Then the reference samples and XCRP were used to extract "digital identity card" of CRP and XCRP again. Based on the matching of the above "digital identity card" and feedback matching credibility (MC) to realize the traceability and adulteration analysis of CRP. The results showed that the traceability analysis can be effectively realized based on the "digital identity card" of CRP from different origins, and the MC was as high as 90%. Even if 5% of CRP was added to XCRP, it can still be effectively detected in adulteration analysis. GRP's origin traceability and adulteration analysis can be realized based on UHPLC-QTOF-MS analysis and "digital identity card" effectively and accurately. It has important reference significance for the quick digital analysis of traceability and adulteration of CRPs and digital quality control of Chinese medicines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.