Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40313792›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2025

A Biomarker-Driven and Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Diagnosing Diabetes Mellitus.

Zhihui Xiao, Mingfu Wang, Yueliang Zhao, Hui Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhihui XiaoCollege of Food Science and Technology Shanghai Ocean University Shanghai China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7948-1455
Mingfu WangShenzhen Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Health, College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering Shenzhen University Shenzhen China.
Yueliang ZhaoCollege of Food Science and Technology Shanghai Ocean University Shanghai China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4374-1602
Hui WangSchool of Public Health Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes is one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. Developing earlier and more accurate diagnosis methods is crucial for clinical prevention and treatment of diabetes. Here, data on biochemical indicators and physiological characteristics of 4335 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database from 2017 to 2020 were collected. After data preprocessing, the dataset was randomly divided into a training set (70%) and a test set (30%); then the Boruta algorithm was used to screen feature indicators on the training set. Next, three machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest (RF), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) were employed to build predictive models through 10-fold cross-validation on the training dataset, followed by performance evaluation on the test dataset. The RF model exhibited the best performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.958 (95% CI: 0.943-0.973), a recall of 0.897, a specificity and F1 score of 0.916 and 0.747, respectively, and an overall accuracy of 0.913. Moreover, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Partial Dependency Plots (PDP) were applied to interpret the RF model to analyze the risk factors for diabetes. Glycohemoglobin, glucose, fasting glucose, age, cholesterol, osmolality, BMI, blood urea nitrogen, and insulin were found to exert the greatest influence on the prevalence of diabetes. Collectively, the RF model has considerable application prospects for the diagnosis of diabetes and can serve as a valuable supplementary tool for clinical diagnosis and risk assessment in diabetes.

Indexed as

biomarker‐drivendiabetes mellitusinterpretablemachine learningprediction model

Identifiers

PMID40313792
PMCPMC12041655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.