Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40313776›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Cracking the Code: Predicting Tumor Microenvironment Enabled Chemoresistance with Machine Learning in the Human Tumoroid Models.

Geeta Mehta, Michael Bregenzer, Pooja Mehta, Kathleen Burkhard

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Geeta MehtaUniversity of Michigan.
Michael BregenzerUniversity of Michigan.
Pooja MehtaUniversity of Michigan.
Kathleen BurkhardUniversity of Michigan.

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Eric R. Fearon · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Tissue Engineering and RegenerationT32DE007057 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DAVID H. KOHN · 1985 to 2026
$17.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NIDCR NIH HHS T32 DE007057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer (HGSC) is marked by substantial inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. The tumor microenvironments (TME) of HGSC show pronounced variability in cellular make-up across metastatic sites, which is linked to poorer patient outcomes. The influence of cellular composition on therapy sensitivity, including chemotherapy and targeted treatments, has not been thoroughly investigated. In this study, we examined the premise that the variations in cellular composition can forecast drug efficacy. Using a high-throughput 3D in vitro tumoroid model, we assessed the drug responses of twenty-three distinct cellular configurations to an assortment of five therapeutic agents, including carboplatin and paclitaxel. By amalgamating our experimental findings with random forest machine learning algorithms, we assessed the influence of TME cellular composition on treatment reactions. Our findings reveal notable disparities in drug responses correlated with tumoroid composition, underscoring the significance of cellular diversity within the TME as a predictor of therapeutic outcomes. However, our work also emphasizes the complex nature of cell composition's influence on drug response. This research establishes a foundation for employing human tumoroids with varied cellular composition as a method to delve into the roles of stromal, immune, and other TME cell types in enhancing cancer cell susceptibility to various treatments. Additionally, these tumoroids can serve as a platform to explore pivotal cellular interactions within the TME that contribute to chemoresistance and cancer recurrence.

Indexed as

cell compositionchemoresistancedrug responseHGSChigh grade serous carcinomamolecular subtypeorganoidovarian cancersspheroids

Identifiers

PMID40313776
PMCPMC12045351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.