ArticleEuropean heart journal open2025
Cardiovascular disease in breast cancer patients: a nationwide real-world evidence study 2013-20.
Article in European heart journal open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical Decision-Making in Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Comparative Study from a Tertiary Center.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Incidental Cardiac Uptake onDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advance at a glance: contributions to cardio-oncology.European heart journal open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Various measures have been implemented in clinical practice to reduce the risk of cardiovascular complications during breast cancer (BC) treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate whether women diagnosed with BC exhibit a higher incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods and results: Matched cohort study. Using data from the Cancer Registry of Norway and the Norwegian Patient Registry, we created a nationwide cohort of women diagnosed with BC between 2013 and 2020 and age-matched controls (matching ratio 1:10). For BC patients, the index date was the date of their BC diagnosis. For controls, the index date was a random date within the index year of the matched BC patient. For eight selected CVDs, we compared the prevalence before BC diagnosis between cases and controls, as well as the overall incidence, hazard ratios (HRs), and cumulative incidences post BC diagnosis. Follow-up was through 2021. Our study population consisted of 27 526 BC patients and 269 904 matched controls. Among the subset of patients without CVD prior to index, BC patients had significantly increased overall and cumulative risk of pulmonary embolism (HR = 3.00, 95% CI: [2.51-3.59]), atrial fibrillation (1.53 [1.38-1.70]), other cardiac arrhythmias (1.43 [1.27-1.61]), heart failure (1.93 [1.33-2.80]), hypertensive heart disease (1.79 [1.67-1.91]), and heart valve disease (2.02 [1.79-2.27]). Conclusion: In this contemporary cohort, BC patients still had an increased risk of several CVDs compared to age-matched controls. Further research is needed to determine the causes of this increased risk, but clinicians should be aware and optimize therapy accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.