ReviewJB & JS open access
Long-Term Outcomes Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review with a Minimum Follow-Up of 10 Years.
Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis, irreparable rotator cuff tears, and rotator cuff tears with arthritis: a 2-year clinical outcome analysis using the Enovis AltiVate reverse.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2026Article
- Technological advancements for surgical planning and intraoperative navigation in elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review.JSES international · 2026Review
- Pedicled transfer of the clavicular head of the pectoralis major muscle for deltoid deficiency in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Long-Term Outcomes of Inverted-Bearing Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty with Large Polyethylene Glenospheres.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Long-term survival outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty: An implant-level systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and registry data with more than 13 years follow-up.Shoulder & elbow · 2026Review
- The mid-term outcomes on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with isolated latissimus dorsi transfer in patients with isolated external rotation lag without pseudoparalysis: an average follow-up of 5 years.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Risk factors for acromial stress fractures following primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the impact of prior acromioplasty and radiographic parameters.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2026Article
- Shoulder arthroplasty following a previous Latarjet procedure.JSES international · 2026Article
- Six-Week Changes in Pain Biomarkers Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Proximal Humerus Fractures - A Contemporary Narrative Review of Management Strategies.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes of metallic hemiarthroplasty for degenerative and inflammatory shoulder pathologies; a systematic review of minimum 10-year follow-up.JSES international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a crucial intervention for restoring shoulder function and alleviating pain. The aim of this review was to evaluate long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of rTSA patients with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases until September 2024. Studies in English or German with a minimum 10-year follow-up were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024558828). Results: Of 673 studies, 7 retrospective case series with Level IV evidence met the inclusion criteria, totaling 469 rTSA procedures in 460 patients. The weighted mean age was 71 years, with 63% female patients. The mean follow-up was 12 years, with a 63% lost to follow-up. Four studies conducted all follow-ups in a clinical setting, while 3 used either outpatient visits (20 to 41%) or phone/mail interviews. The weighted mean reported revision-free implant survivorship reported in 5 studies was 88% at 10 years. Overall, the complication rate was 36% with need for further revision in 23% of patients. The revisions were primarily due to infection (8%), instability (7%), and glenoidal complications (3%). Significant functional improvements were noted across all studies. The absolute Constant score (CS) improved from 27 to 62 across 5 studies, and the relative CS improved from 37% preoperatively to 81% across 3 studies. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score improved from 35 to 74 (p < 0.001) and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation from 23 to 73 (p < 0.001), in 1 study each. The Subjective Shoulder Value increased from 28% to 79% (p = 0.001) in 2 studies. Weighted mean range of motion improvements included active abduction of 54°, active anterior elevation of 52°, and active external rotation of 8°. Longitudinal outcomes were reported to be stable in the due course in 5 studies and deteriorated in 1. Scapular notching varied widely, with Nerot-Sirveaux grades I and II in 15% to 59% of cases, and grades III and IV in 7% to 47%. Conclusion: RTSA appears to provide substantial long-term improvements in shoulder function, clinical outcomes, and pain relief, albeit with significant complication and revision rates. However, caution is warranted when interpreting the data due to high lost-to-follow-up rates and limited data quality in the contemporary literature. Long-term registry data will be essential. Level of Evidence: Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.