Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40313685›Full record

ReviewJB & JS open access

Long-Term Outcomes Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review with a Minimum Follow-Up of 10 Years.

Matthias Biner, Stafan Klotz, Octavian Andronic, Daniel C Karczewski, Lukas Zingg, Wieser Karl, Philipp Kriechling

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthias BinerDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stafan KlotzDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Octavian AndronicDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3743-7033
Daniel C KarczewskiDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7409-9002
Lukas ZinggDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7205-5257
Wieser KarlDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8495-6189
Philipp KriechlingDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6010-8847

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a crucial intervention for restoring shoulder function and alleviating pain. The aim of this review was to evaluate long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of rTSA patients with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases until September 2024. Studies in English or German with a minimum 10-year follow-up were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024558828). Results: Of 673 studies, 7 retrospective case series with Level IV evidence met the inclusion criteria, totaling 469 rTSA procedures in 460 patients. The weighted mean age was 71 years, with 63% female patients. The mean follow-up was 12 years, with a 63% lost to follow-up. Four studies conducted all follow-ups in a clinical setting, while 3 used either outpatient visits (20 to 41%) or phone/mail interviews. The weighted mean reported revision-free implant survivorship reported in 5 studies was 88% at 10 years. Overall, the complication rate was 36% with need for further revision in 23% of patients. The revisions were primarily due to infection (8%), instability (7%), and glenoidal complications (3%). Significant functional improvements were noted across all studies. The absolute Constant score (CS) improved from 27 to 62 across 5 studies, and the relative CS improved from 37% preoperatively to 81% across 3 studies. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score improved from 35 to 74 (p < 0.001) and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation from 23 to 73 (p < 0.001), in 1 study each. The Subjective Shoulder Value increased from 28% to 79% (p = 0.001) in 2 studies. Weighted mean range of motion improvements included active abduction of 54°, active anterior elevation of 52°, and active external rotation of 8°. Longitudinal outcomes were reported to be stable in the due course in 5 studies and deteriorated in 1. Scapular notching varied widely, with Nerot-Sirveaux grades I and II in 15% to 59% of cases, and grades III and IV in 7% to 47%. Conclusion: RTSA appears to provide substantial long-term improvements in shoulder function, clinical outcomes, and pain relief, albeit with significant complication and revision rates. However, caution is warranted when interpreting the data due to high lost-to-follow-up rates and limited data quality in the contemporary literature. Long-term registry data will be essential. Level of Evidence: Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Identifiers

PMID40313685
PMCPMC12039979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.