Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40313644›Full record

ArticleSocial psychology of education : an international journal2025

Knowledge and comfort predict teaching about sexism in school teachers.

Aífe Hopkins-Doyle, Lindsey Cameron, Lauren Spinner, Bridget Dibb, Andrea Kočiš, Rose Brett, Harriet R Tenenbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychology of education : an international journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aífe Hopkins-DoyleUniversity of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH UK.
Lindsey CameronUniversity of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Lauren SpinnerEducation Endowment Fund, London, UK.
Bridget DibbUniversity of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH UK.
Andrea KočišUniversity of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH UK.
Rose BrettUniversity of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
Harriet R TenenbaumUniversity of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6494-6853

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although lessons about sexism can increase gender egalitarianism in children, teachers often shy away from discussing sensitive topics, such as sexism, in classrooms. We conducted two studies to examine why teachers may not discuss sexism. In a qualitative study with 20 primary school teachers, teachers reported not discussing sexism because of the belief that sexism was not an issue, low comfort, and low knowledge levels in teaching sexism, that sexism was less important than other topics, and not enough support from parents and schools. Teachers taught about sexism to balance out other perspectives, when they had support from authorities, and when sexism was related to a lesson. Using the themes found in Study 1, Study 2 developed quantitative measures to examine the predictors of intentions to teach about sexism among 233 primary and secondary school teachers. The full model found that teachers had higher intentions to teach about sexism when they felt more comfortable and knowledgeable about teaching sexism and when teachers were younger. We discuss findings from both studies in terms of theoretical and practical implications.

Indexed as

Mixed methodsSchool lessonsSexismTeachers

Identifiers

PMID40313644
PMCPMC12041106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.