Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40313603›Full record

ArticlePhenomics (Cham, Switzerland)2025

Impact of DNA Extraction Methods on Gut Microbiome Profiles: A Comparative Metagenomic Study.

Yanni Pu, Xiaofeng Zhou, Hao Cai, Tao Lou, Chenglin Liu, Mengmeng Kong, Zhonghan Sun, Yanren Wang, Ruyi Zhang, Yuxuan Zhu and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quercetin alleviates CClBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026
    Article
  6. Fecal virome of paraguayan hairy dwarf porcupine (Coendou spinosus, Cuvier, 1823) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  7. Quantitative metagenomics using a portable protocol.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effects of biopolymers, cork, andFrontiers in microbiomes · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yanni Pu *State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute, and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Room C601, No. 2005 Songhu Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200438 China.ORCID 0000-0002-9603-4584
Xiaofeng Zhou *State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute, and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Room C601, No. 2005 Songhu Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200438 China.ORCID 0009-0001-0680-0223
Hao CaiState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute, and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Room C601, No. 2005 Songhu Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200438 China.
Tao LouState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute, and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Room C601, No. 2005 Songhu Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200438 China.ORCID 0009-0009-4101-7259
Chenglin LiuState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute, and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Room C601, No. 2005 Songhu Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200438 China.ORCID 0000-0001-5626-4097
Mengmeng KongState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute, and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Room C601, No. 2005 Songhu Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200438 China.ORCID 0000-0003-3005-2306
Zhonghan SunState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute, and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Room C601, No. 2005 Songhu Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200438 China.ORCID 0000-0003-4171-9794
Yanren WangMinistry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Institute of Biodiversity Science, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438 China.ORCID 0000-0001-7792-1930
Ruyi ZhangMinistry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Institute of Biodiversity Science, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438 China.
Yuxuan ZhuState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute, and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Room C601, No. 2005 Songhu Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200438 China.ORCID 0009-0005-6729-2823
Lin YeState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute, and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Room C601, No. 2005 Songhu Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200438 China.ORCID 0009-0006-5676-2786
Yuanting ZhengState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Human Phenome Institute and Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438 China.ORCID 0000-0003-4480-8303
Baoli ZhuKey Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Regions, Taoyuan Agro-Ecosystem Research Station, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, 410125 China.
Zhexue QuanMinistry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Institute of Biodiversity Science, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438 China.ORCID 0000-0002-7561-8572
Guoping ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute, and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Room C601, No. 2005 Songhu Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200438 China.ORCID 0000-0002-7621-6620
Yan ZhengState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute, and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Room C601, No. 2005 Songhu Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200438 China.ORCID 0000-0003-1129-3147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In gut microbial research, DNA extraction remarkably influences study outcomes and biological interpretations. Rapid advancements in the research scale and technological upgrades necessitate evaluating new methods to ensure reliability and precision in microbial community profiling. We systematically evaluated the performance of eight recent and commonly used extraction methods using a microbial mock community (MMC) and fecal samples from two healthy volunteers, incorporating bacterial, archaeal, and fungal constituents. Performance metrics included nucleic acid assessment, microbial profile assessment, and scalability for large-scale studies, leveraging shotgun metagenomics for in-depth analysis. Despite variations in DNA quantity and quality, all methods yielded sufficient DNA for shotgun metagenomic sequencing. In the MMC microbial profile assessment, the QIAamp PowerFecal pro Kit (PF) and DNeasy PowerSoil HTP kit (PS) methods exhibited higher similarity with the theoretical composition and lower variability across technical replicates compared to other methods. For fecal samples, the extraction method accounted for 21.4% of the overall microbiome variation and significantly affected the abundances of 32% of detected microbial species. Methods using mechanical lysis with small beads, such as PF and PS, demonstrated better efficiency, indicated by increased microbial diversity in extracting DNA from Gram-positive bacteria. Furthermore, the PF and PS methods are notably simple to execute and automation-friendly, though relatively costly. Our study underscores the importance of maintaining consistency in DNA extraction methods for reliable comparative metagenomic analyses. We recommend PF and PS methods as optimal for expansive gut metagenomic research, emphasizing the critical role of mechanical lysis in DNA extraction. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43657-025-00232-x.

Indexed as

DNA extractionGut microbiotaMethod evaluationShotgun metagenomics

Identifiers

PMID40313603
PMCPMC12040788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.