ArticleBJUI compass2025
Female urethral stricture: A multi-centre experience and lessons learnt.
Article in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dorsal Versus Ventral Onlay Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty in Female Urethral Stricture: A Meta-Analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2026Pooled it
- Female Urethroplasty: A Critical Review of Indications, Techniques and Concerns.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Female urethral stricture: A multi-centre experience and lessons learnt.BJUI compass · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To review demographics, surgical techniques and outcomes of female patients undergoing buccal mucosal graft substitution urethroplasty. Materials and methods: An international multi-institutional study was performed through a retrospective review of a prospectively managed database of female urethroplasty outcomes at two sites from December 2016 to June 2023. Institutions included a high-volume tertiary referral centre performing 500 urethroplasties annually, and a regional centre with a fellowship-trained urethroplasty surgeon performing ~50 urethroplasties annually. Female urethroplasty accounted for 2% of urethroplasties performed, utilising dorsal onlay, ventral inlay and double-face techniques. Results: Forty-two patients underwent female urethroplasty between 2016 and 2023; 20 dorsal onlay grafts, 14 ventral inlay grafts and 8 double-face urethroplasty. The mean age was 45 years (SD 12.07) and mean follow-up 27 months (SD 17.22). The most common aetiology was idiopathic in 59%. The most common presenting symptom was obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms in 86%. Urethral dilatations were the most common treatment before urethroplasty, with a mean of 9 (SD 1.2) dilations pre-urethroplasty. Stricture locations seen were; proximal 7%, proximal to mid-14%, mid-31%, mid to distal 10% and distal 38%. A total of 88% were successful overall; dorsal onlay was 100%, ventral inlay urethroplasties 71% and double-face 88%. Mean Qmax improvement was 291% at 6 months. In those who required dilatations or further surgery postoperatively (n = 5); four were ventral inlay (one mid-distal, three distal), and one double-face distal stricture. All patients including those requiring secondary treatments were continent and did not require intermittent self-catheterisation or suprapubic catheter insertion. Conclusion: Urethroplasty is an effective long-term therapeutic option for managing female urethral strictures. Dorsal onlay urethroplasty demonstrated the highest success rate, and stands out as a versatile technique, addressing distal to proximal urethral strictures. However, the chosen urethroplasty technique should be tailored to the characteristics of the stricture, patient and surgeons experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.