Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40313562›Full record

ArticleCommunications earth & environment2025

Offshore wind farms modify coastal food web dynamics by enhancing suspension feeder pathways.

Emil De Borger, Dick van Oevelen, Ninon Mavraki, Annelies De Backer, Ulrike Braeckman, Karline Soetaert, Jan Vanaverbeke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications earth & environment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emil De BorgerGhent University, Department of Biology, Marine Biology Research Group, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4905-1637
Dick van OevelenRoyal Netherlands Institute of Sea Research (NIOZ), Department of Estuarine and Delta Systems, Yerseke, The Netherlands.
Ninon MavrakiWageningen Marine Research, Den Helder, The Netherlands.
Annelies De BackerFlanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), ILVO Marine Research, Oostende, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9129-9009
Ulrike BraeckmanGhent University, Department of Biology, Marine Biology Research Group, Ghent, Belgium.
Karline SoetaertRoyal Netherlands Institute of Sea Research (NIOZ), Department of Estuarine and Delta Systems, Yerseke, The Netherlands.
Jan VanaverbekeGhent University, Department of Biology, Marine Biology Research Group, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the global offshore wind farm (OWF) proliferation, we investigated the impact of OWFs on the marine food web. Using linear inverse modelling (LIM), we compared the OWF food web with two soft-sediment food webs nearby. Novel in situ data on species biomass and their isotopic composition were combined with literature data to construct food webs. Our findings highlight the prominent role of hard-substrate species on turbine foundations as organic material inputs for the food web. Hard substrate species account for approximately 26% of food source uptake from the water column and increase carbon deposition on the surrounding seafloor by ~10%. OWFs facilitate a novel food web with a higher productivity than expected based on standing biomass alone, as a result of numerous interactions between a diverse species community. Our study underscores profound effects of OWFs on marine ecosystems, suggesting the need for further research into their ecological impacts.

Indexed as

Ecological modellingEcological networksEcosystem ecologyFood webs

Identifiers

PMID40313562
PMCPMC12040705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.