ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Distinct immunological signatures define three sepsis recovery trajectories: a multi-cohort machine learning study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parallel single-cell host immune profiling and pathogen genomic characterization inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Observational
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Modulates the Inflammatory Milieu and Organ Failure Trajectory in Severe COVID-19 and Sepsis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Understanding heterogeneous recovery patterns in sepsis is crucial for personalizing treatment strategies and improving outcomes. Objective: To identify distinct recovery trajectories in sepsis and develop a prediction model using early clinical and immunological markers. Design setting and participants: Retrospective cohort study using data from 28,745 adult patients admitted to 12 intensive care units (ICUs) with sepsis between January 2014 and December 2024. Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcome was the 28-day trajectory of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality and hospital length of stay. Results: Among 24,450 eligible patients (mean [SD] age, 64.5 [15.3] years; 54.2% male), three distinct recovery trajectories were identified: rapid recovery (42.3%), slow recovery (35.8%), and deterioration (21.9%). The machine learning model achieved an AUROC of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.83-0.87) for trajectory prediction. Key predictors included initial SOFA score, lactate levels, and inflammatory markers. Mortality rates were 12.3, 28.7, and 45.6% for rapid, slow, and deterioration groups, respectively. Conclusions and relevance: Early prediction of sepsis recovery trajectories is feasible and may facilitate personalized treatment strategies. The developed model could assist clinical decision-making and resource allocation in critical care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.