ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Immediate effects of high-intensity laser therapy for nonspecific neck pain: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The importance of power in photobiomodulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-intensity laser therapy.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and cortical mechanisms of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation in non-specific neck and low back pain: a prospective, two-center, randomized, sham-controlled fNIRS study.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Trial
- Leveraging artificial intelligence for early detection and prediction of acute kidney injury in clinical practice.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this research was to assess the immediate effects of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) on nonspecific neck pain (NNP) by evaluating outcome measures such as pain intensity, cervical active range of motion (ROM), stiffness of neck muscles, and functional disability. Methods: This clinical trial, which was conducted in a double-blind and randomized manner, involved patients diagnosed with NNP who were allocated either to either a HILT group (HILT + exercise) or a placebo group (placebo-laser therapy + exercise). The primary outcome measures encompassed pain intensity via the visual analogue scale (VAS), cervical active ROM, stiffness of neck muscles (splenius capitis, semispinalis capitis, and neck fascia), as well as functional disability via the neck disability index (NDI). Statistical evaluations were carried out using SPSS version 25.0, with a significance threshold established at Results: A total of 28 individuals diagnosed with NNP were randomly allocated to either the HILT group ( Conclusion: HILT has immediate efficacy for NNP and may be considered as one of the alternative interventions for NNP. Clinical trial registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR2200061008.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.