Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40313502›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Knowledge, attitudes, practices (KAP), and risk factors toward zoonotic diseases among smallholder livestock farmers in Bugesera district of Rwanda.

Celestin Munyaneza, Ferdinand Bizimana, Felicitas Mukumbo, Sandrine Gatesi, Ephrem Sibomana, Severin Munyampuhwe, Marie Fausta Dutuze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Celestin MunyanezaRwanda Institute for Conservation Agriculture (RICA), Bugesera, Rwanda.
Ferdinand BizimanaRwanda Institute for Conservation Agriculture (RICA), Bugesera, Rwanda.
Felicitas MukumboRwanda Institute for Conservation Agriculture (RICA), Bugesera, Rwanda.
Sandrine GatesiRwanda Institute for Conservation Agriculture (RICA), Bugesera, Rwanda.
Ephrem SibomanaRwanda Institute for Conservation Agriculture (RICA), Bugesera, Rwanda.
Severin MunyampuhweRwanda Institute for Conservation Agriculture (RICA), Bugesera, Rwanda.
Marie Fausta DutuzeRwanda Institute for Conservation Agriculture (RICA), Bugesera, Rwanda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although zoonotic diseases pose significant health and economic threats globally, rural communities in developing countries are more vulnerable due to the increased proximity between animals and humans and the lack of knowledge about these diseases. This study assessed the knowledge, attitudes, practices (KAP), and risk factors regarding zoonotic diseases among smallholder livestock farmers in Bugesera district of Rwanda. Methods and materials: A convenient sample of 155 livestock smallholder farmers was selected from eight of the fifteen sectors of the district. Data were collected through interviews using a semi-structured questionnaire. Descriptive analyses including frequencies and means were used to summarize the data. Pearson's chi-square test was used to examine associations between knowledge and socio-demographic variables and between knowledge and practices. Results: Findings showed that 50.3% of respondents knew diseases could be transmitted from animals to humans and just 13.5% recognized reverse zoonotic transmission - humans to animals. When specifically asked if they knew about brucellosis, tuberculosis, and Rift Valley fever; 88, 79, and 41% of respondents, respectively, reported being familiar with these diseases though many were unaware of their zoonotic nature. Risky attitudes and practices were prevalent, including the lack of isolation for sick animals (70.97%) and failure to quarantine newly introduced animals (83.87%). While 81.94% vaccinated their animals, only 16.54% could specify at least one vaccinated disease, and none knew the date of their animals' next vaccination date. Other poor practices were reported, with 64.52% not separating animal and human utensils, and only 25.81% of cattle owners reported using artificial insemination. Additionally, 34.46% consumed raw non-boiled milk, and 24.5% did not use mosquito nets. Regarding roaming animals in the neighborhood, 79% of rats, 55% bats, 68% dogs, 67% cats, and 5.2% monkeys. Conclusion: The study revealed low awareness and high-risk practices regarding zoonotic diseases among smallholder livestock farmers in Bugesera district, posing a significant One Health concern. Therefore, educational programs to improve KAP and strengthen zoonotic disease prevention efforts in this district.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryFarmersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeLivestockZoonosesAdultAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsRural PopulationRwandaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultattitudesknowledgeone healthpracticesrisk factorssmallholder livestock farmerszoonoses

Identifiers

PMID40313502
PMCPMC12043602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.