ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2025
Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) harvested in the axial and appendicular skeleton does not differ in progenitor cell count: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-Action Regenerative Therapies: Regeneration and Antimicrobial Effects of Platelet- and Marrow-Derived Biologics.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Modern Approaches and Emerging Biological Therapies to Treat Fracture Nonunion.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) is a reliable source of progenitor cells that facilitate healing, and it is typically harvested from the iliac crest. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare total nucleated cell (TNC) count and the presence of colony-forming units (CFUs) in BMAC harvested from axial versus appendicular harvest sites. Methods: In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched in August 2024 for studies published after 2004. Studies were included if they evaluated cell counts within BMAC samples harvested from males and females of any age and were prospective. Studies that had no reported cell count within BMAC samples, had evaluations of biologic material other than BMAC, or were translational or cadaveric studies, as well as review articles or technical notes, were excluded. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on whether BMAC was harvested from their axial or appendicular skeleton. Results: The initial search identified 2126 studies, of which 15 non-randomized prospective studies with a total of 583 patients were included. Each study had low risk of bias. In the axial skeleton, TNC counts ranged from 0.1-502 × 10 Conclusions: BMAC harvested from the axial and appendicular skeletons demonstrate significant variability in progenitor cell concentration. These findings suggest that harvesting at appendicular sites near the operative location allows the surgeon to extract sufficient quality BMAC as compared to harvest sites within the axial skeleton, such as the iliac crest. Level of evidence: Level II, systematic review of level II studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.