ArticleCureus2025
Cardiac Arrest Simulation Response Time: A Comparative Study in Preclinical Medical Education.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Medical students often face a critical challenge when transitioning from academia to real-world clinical practice, especially in life-or-death situations such as cardiac arrests. Despite extensive classroom training, newly trained physicians often feel unprepared for actual emergencies. Simulation-based learning has emerged as a crucial tool in bridging this gap, offering students realistic scenarios for practicing life-saving skills, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This study aimed to assess whether increased exposure to simulated cardiac arrest scenarios enhances the response time of first-year medical students when initiating CPR. Methods A total of 29 first-year medical students were randomized into two groups: the "lethal treatment arm" and the "normal treatment arm," differing in the frequency of CPR simulations. All participants completed a pre-test, followed by six practice simulations, and a final test. The time to initiate CPR ("time to chest") was recorded and compared between the two groups. Results Results showed significant reductions in CPR response times from the initial to final simulation for both groups, though no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of response time improvement. Conclusion This suggests that even limited exposure to CPR simulations significantly enhances medical students' readiness to respond to cardiac arrests. Further research is needed to determine the optimal quantity and frequency of simulation training for maintaining high-quality CPR performance among medical students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.