ReviewCurrent urology2025
Current role of radiomics and radiogenomics in predicting oncological outcomes in bladder cancer.
Review in Current urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of radiomics for detecting and characterising upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC): a systematic review.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Role of Radiomics to Predict Disease Recurrence in Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Non-Invasive Markers in Bladder Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Systems Biology and Multi-Omics Determinants of Response to Bladder-Preserving Trimodality Therapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in urological malignancy diagnosis and prognosis: current status and future prospects.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Review
- Beyond Visualization: Advanced Imaging, Theragnostics and Biomarker Integration in Urothelial Bladder Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiomics refers to the conversion of medical images into high-throughput, quantifiable data to analyze disease patterns, aid decision-making, and predict prognosis. Radiogenomics is an extension of radiomics and involves a combination of conventional radiomics techniques with molecular analysis in the form of genomic and transcriptomic data. In the field of bladder cancer, studies have investigated the development, implementation, and efficacy of radiomic and radiogenomic nomograms in predicting tumor grade, gene expression, and oncological outcomes, with variable results. We aimed to perform a systematic review of the current literature to investigate the development of a radiomics-based nomogram to predict oncological outcomes in bladder cancer. Materials and methods: The Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched up to February 17, 2023. Gray literature was also searched to further identify other suitable publications. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 and Radiomics Quality Score. Results: Radiogenomic nomograms generally had good performance in predicting the primary outcome across the included studies. The median area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity across the included studies were 0.83 (0.63-0.973), 0.813, and 0.815, respectively, in the training set and 0.75 (0.702-0.838), 0.723, and 0.652, respectively, in the validation set. Conclusions: Several studies have demonstrated the predictive potential of radiomic and radiogenomic models in advanced pelvic oncology. Further large-scale studies in a prospective setting are required to further validate results and allow generalized use in modern medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.