Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40313417›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology2025

Current role of radiomics and radiogenomics in predicting oncological outcomes in bladder cancer.

Niall J O'Sullivan, Hugo C Temperley, Alison Corr, James F M Meaney, Peter E Lonergan, Michael E Kelly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Role of Radiomics to Predict Disease Recurrence in Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Niall J O'SullivanDepartment of Radiology, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Hugo C TemperleyDepartment of Surgery, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Alison CorrDepartment of Radiology, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
James F M MeaneyDepartment of Radiology, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Peter E LonerganDepartment of Urology, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Michael E KellySchool of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Radiomics refers to the conversion of medical images into high-throughput, quantifiable data to analyze disease patterns, aid decision-making, and predict prognosis. Radiogenomics is an extension of radiomics and involves a combination of conventional radiomics techniques with molecular analysis in the form of genomic and transcriptomic data. In the field of bladder cancer, studies have investigated the development, implementation, and efficacy of radiomic and radiogenomic nomograms in predicting tumor grade, gene expression, and oncological outcomes, with variable results. We aimed to perform a systematic review of the current literature to investigate the development of a radiomics-based nomogram to predict oncological outcomes in bladder cancer. Materials and methods: The Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched up to February 17, 2023. Gray literature was also searched to further identify other suitable publications. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 and Radiomics Quality Score. Results: Radiogenomic nomograms generally had good performance in predicting the primary outcome across the included studies. The median area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity across the included studies were 0.83 (0.63-0.973), 0.813, and 0.815, respectively, in the training set and 0.75 (0.702-0.838), 0.723, and 0.652, respectively, in the validation set. Conclusions: Several studies have demonstrated the predictive potential of radiomic and radiogenomic models in advanced pelvic oncology. Further large-scale studies in a prospective setting are required to further validate results and allow generalized use in modern medicine.

Indexed as

Bladder cancerOncologyRadiogenomicsRadiomicsRecurrenceSurvivalTreatment response

Identifiers

PMID40313417
PMCPMC12042192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.