ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2025
WS-SfMLearner: self-supervised monocular depth and ego-motion estimation on surgical videos with unknown camera parameters.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- SHADeS: self-supervised monocular depth estimation through non-Lambertian image decomposition.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- WS-SfMLearner: self-supervised monocular depth and ego-motion estimation on surgical videos with unknown camera parameters.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Accurate depth estimation in surgical videos is a pivotal component of numerous image-guided surgery procedures. However, creating ground truth depth maps for surgical videos is often infeasible due to challenges such as inconsistent illumination and sensor noise. As a result, self-supervised depth and ego-motion estimation frameworks are gaining traction, eliminating the need for manually annotated depth maps. Despite the progress, current self-supervised methods still rely on known camera intrinsic parameters, which are frequently unavailable or unrecorded in surgical environments. We address this gap by introducing a self-supervised system capable of jointly predicting depth maps, camera poses, and intrinsic parameters, providing a comprehensive solution for depth estimation under such constraints. Approach: We developed a self-supervised depth and ego-motion estimation framework, incorporating a cost volume-based auxiliary supervision module. This module provides additional supervision for predicting camera intrinsic parameters, allowing for robust estimation even without predefined intrinsics. The system was rigorously evaluated on a public dataset to assess its effectiveness in simultaneously predicting depth, camera pose, and intrinsic parameters. Results: The experimental results demonstrated that the proposed method significantly improved the accuracy of ego-motion and depth prediction, even when compared with methods incorporating known camera intrinsics. In addition, by integrating our cost volume-based supervision, the accuracy of camera parameter estimation, including intrinsic parameters, was further enhanced. Conclusions: We present a self-supervised system for depth, ego-motion, and intrinsic parameter estimation, effectively overcoming the limitations imposed by unknown or missing camera intrinsics. The experimental results confirm that the proposed method outperforms the baseline techniques, offering a robust solution for depth estimation in complex surgical video scenarios, with broader implications for improving image-guided surgery systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.