ArticlePeerJ2025
Simulation of electroporation threshold based on the evolution of transmembrane potential and pore density.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To study the electric field threshold of electroporation of real cell membrane structures under the action of the pulsed electric field, in this article, a finite element model of the real cell containing endoplasmic reticulum and nucleus was constructed in real cell staining images by cluster segmentation and edge extraction techniques. The electroporation equation was introduced into the real cell model to calculate the threshold value of different membrane structures for electroporation under a pulsed electric field. The results showed that the transmembrane potentials of the cell membrane, endoplasmic reticulum membrane, and nuclear membrane reached the electroporation thresholds at 1.2, 2.6, and 2.9 kV/cm, while the pore density thresholds were 1.7 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.