ReviewDEN open2026
Assessing the effectiveness of texture and color enhancement imaging versus white-light endoscopy in detecting gastrointestinal lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in DEN open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comprehensive impact of Intermittent Hypoxia Training and Intermittent Fasting on metabolic and cognitive health in adults with obesity: an umbrella systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Enhancing the Evidence: Critical Insights and Future Directions for Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging in Colorectal Neoplasia Detection.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopy and high-quality data for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Gastrointestinal cancers account for 26% of cancer incidence and 35% of cancer-related deaths globally. Early detection is crucial but often limited by white light endoscopy (WLE), which misses subtle lesions. Texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI), introduced in 2020, enhances texture, brightness, and color, addressing WLE's limitations. This meta-analysis evaluates TXI's effectiveness compared to WLE in gastrointestinal lesion lesion detection. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Searches of CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science identified randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing TXI with WLE. Outcomes included lesion detection rates, color differentiation, and visibility scores. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROB 2.0 tool and Newcastle-Ottawa tools, and evidence certainty was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Results: Seventeen studies with 16,634 participants were included. TXI significantly improved color differentiation (mean difference: 3.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.49-4.13), visibility scores (mean difference: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.36-0.64), and lesion detection rates (odds ratio [OR]: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.52-2.22) compared to WLE. Subgroup analyses confirmed TXI's advantages across pharyngeal, esophageal, gastric, and colorectal lesions. TXI also enhanced adenoma detection rates (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.31-2.12) and mean adenoma detection per procedure (mean difference: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25-0.70). Conclusion: TXI improves gastriontestinal lesion lesion detection by enhancing visualization and color differentiation, addressing key limitations of WLE. These findings support its integration into routine endoscopy, with further research needed to compare TXI with other modalities and explore its potential in real-time lesion detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.