ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Large language models for extracting histopathologic diagnoses of colorectal cancer and dysplasia from electronic health records.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Accurate data resources are essential for impactful medical research, but available structured datasets are often incomplete or inaccurate. Recent advances in open-weight large language models (LLMs) enable more accurate data extraction from unstructured text in electronic health records (EHRs) but have not yet been thoroughly validated for challenging diagnoses such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-related neoplasia. Objective: Create a validated approach using LLMs for identifying histopathologic diagnoses in pathology reports from the nationwide Veterans Health Administration database, including patients with genotype data within the Million Veteran Program (MVP) biobank. Design: Our approach utilizes simple 'yes/no' question prompts for following phenotypes of interest: any colorectal dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia and/or colorectal adenocarcinoma (HGD/CRC), and invasive CRC. We validated the method on diagnostic tasks by applying prompts to reports from patients with IBD (and validated separately in non-IBD) and calculated F-1 scores as a balanced accuracy measure. Results: In patients with IBD in MVP, we achieved F1-scores of 96.1% (95% CI 92.5-99.4%) for identifying dysplasia, 93.7% (88.2-98.4%) for identifying HGD/CRC, and 98% (96.3-99.4%) for identifying CRC. In patients without IBD in MVP, we achieved F1-scores of 99.2% (98.2-100%) for identifying any colorectal dysplasia, 96.5% (93.0-99.2%) for identifying HGD/CRC, and 95% (92.8-97.2%) for identifying CRC using LLM Gemma-2. Conclusion: LLMs provided excellent accuracy in extracting the diagnoses of interest from EHRs. Our validated methods generalized to unstructured pathology notes, even withstanding challenges of resource-limited computing environments. This may therefore be a promising approach for other clinical phenotypes given the minimal human-led development required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.