ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Artificial Intelligence-based Diagnosis of Kaposi Sarcoma using Photographs in Dark-skinned Patients.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Advanced-stage disease at the time of diagnosis, with resultant high mortality, is among the most urgent issues for HIV-related Kaposi sarcoma (KS) in sub-Saharan Africa. Lack of access to skilled clinical personnel and histopathologic technology in the region contribute to diagnostic delays and advanced stage at diagnosis. Accordingly, new paradigms for KS diagnosis are needed. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI)-based interpretation of digital surface images of skin lesions to diagnose KS among dark-skinned patients in Uganda. Design: Cross-sectional study of consecutive participants referred to skin biopsy services in Uganda because of clinical suspicion of KS. Lesions were photographed using a digital camera, and punch biopsies were obtained. Histopathologic interpretation was considered the gold standard. Using training (∼70% of images) and validation (∼10% of images) sets, we developed a prediction model using a rule-based combination of YOLO (You Only Look Once) version 5 and 8 object detection classifiers. Setting: Free-of-charge skin biopsy services. Participants: Consecutive sample of 482 individuals were evaluated due to clinical suspicion of KS. Main Outcomes: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (with accompanying 95% confidence intervals) of the AI-based prediction model in a test set (∼20% of images). The accuracy of a dermatologist's visual interpretation of images was also described. Results: 472 participants (1385 images) were evaluable. Of these, 36% were female, median age was 34 years, and 94% had HIV; 332 had KS, and 140 had no KS by histopathology. In the test set, the AI-derived prediction model achieved 89% sensitivity (85%-94%) and 51% specificity (40%-61%) for diagnosing KS; positive predictive value was 81% (75%-86%) and negative predictive value was 67% (55%-78%). A dermatologist evaluating the same images, with emphasis on sensitivity, achieved sensitivity of 93% (89%-96%) and specificity of 19% (11%-28%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among dark-skinned patients in Uganda with skin lesions suspicious for KS, evaluation of digital surface images by an AI-based prediction model produced moderate accuracy for diagnosing KS. While currently inadequate for clinical use, this inaugural assessment is sufficiently promising to justify evaluation of larger datasets and evolving technologies to determine if accuracy can be improved. Key Points:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.