Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40313231›Full record

SynthesisEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2025

Review article: Use of prehospital early warning scores to predict short-term mortality: A systematic review.

David Naylor, Bridget Dicker, Graham Howie, Verity Todd

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Assessing Risk of Early ICU Admission or Death at Emergency Department Triage: Clinical Judgment Versus Early Warning Scores.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David NaylorParamedicine Research Unit, Paramedicine Department, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0009-0009-8747-7410
Bridget DickerParamedicine Research Unit, Paramedicine Department, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Graham HowieParamedicine Research Unit, Paramedicine Department, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Verity ToddParamedicine Research Unit, Paramedicine Department, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early Warning Scores (EWS) have been developed to identify patients at risk of deterioration. Although the application of EWS has become increasingly established in the prehospital setting, their use remains contentious. The aim of this systematic review is to summarise the most recent evidence on the predictive accuracy of the EWS for short-term mortality in adults in the prehospital setting. A systematic search was conducted using the Medline, CINAHL, and Scopus databases. Studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the prehospital Modified Early Warning Score, National Early Warning Score or National Early Warning Score 2 in predicting mortality were included. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) admission and hospital admission. The review included 16 studies published between 2012 and 2023, with the number of patients totalling 311 932. The literature indicated that prehospital EWS demonstrated a moderate to good diagnostic performance in predicting short-term mortality with an area under receiver operating characteristic curve ranging from 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.73) to 0.90 (95% CI: 0.82-0.97). Overall, diagnostic performance was higher for predicting mortality in short time frames (up to 48 h). The need to use relatively high cut-off points to identify at-risk patients may limit its use for the unselected patient populations found in the prehospital setting. The potential for under-triage and over-triage limits their use further. EWS should not replace structured clinical evaluation and judgement but may be useful as complementary and objective tools to aid the identification of patients at risk.

Indexed as

Early Warning ScoreEmergency Medical ServicesMortalityHumansPredictive Value of Testsearly warning scoreemergency servicemortalityout of hospitalparamedicprehospital

Identifiers

PMID40313231
PMCPMC12046484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.