Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40313145›Full record

ArticleChild health nursing research2025

Factors influencing on future core nursing competency: focusing on King's Dynamic Interaction System Model in South Korea: a cross-sectional study.

Cheol Eon Park, Jeonghun Kang, Soon Hyun Myung, Hyun Seo Yoo, In Young Cho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child health nursing research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cheol Eon ParkUndergraduate Student, College of Nursing, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.
Jeonghun KangUndergraduate Student, College of Nursing, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.
Soon Hyun MyungUndergraduate Student, College of Nursing, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.
Hyun Seo YooUndergraduate Student, College of Nursing, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.
In Young ChoCollege of Nursing, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to examine the relationship between future core nursing competencies and key variables, identifying factors influencing these competencies among senior nursing students.

methodsThis cross-sectional study included 150 third- and fourth-year nursing students in South Korea. Based on King's Dynamic Interaction System Model, perceived work value and individual innovative behavior were categorized as personal systems, interpersonal competence as an interpersonal system, and adhocracy culture as a social system. Participants completed self-reported online questionnaires to assess factors influencing future core nursing competencies.

resultsHierarchical multiple regression analysis identified interpersonal competency (β=0.32, p=.012) and adhocracy culture (β=0.23, p=.010) as significant predictors of future core nursing competency explaining 30.9% of the variance.

conclusionEnhancing future core nursing competency among senior nursing students requires continuous education and counseling programs to strengthen interpersonal competency. Establishing an adhocracy culture involves recognizing creative ideas, fostering open communication for freely expressing ideas, and encouraging innovation. Therefore, developing interpersonal competence and promoting an adhocracy culture is essential for improving future core nursing competency in senior nursing students.

Indexed as

Clinical competenceInterpersonal relationsNursingOrganizational cultureOrganizational innovation

Identifiers

PMID40313145
PMCPMC12046358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.